California’s Prop 50: The NAACP’s Fight to Protect Black Political Power Against Gerrymandering
The History Behind The Headlines
By Darius Spearman (africanelements)
Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.
The Battle Lines Are Drawn: Black Votes Under Siege
The NAACP has invested three-quarters of a million dollars in a campaign that could reshape Black political power for the next decade. California voters will decide on November 4, 2025, whether to approve Proposition 50, a ballot measure designed to counter an aggressive Republican redistricting scheme in Texas (NAACP). The stakes reach far beyond state borders. This fight represents a direct response to President Donald Trump’s coordinated effort to manipulate congressional districts and silence Black voters across America.
California’s response comes after Texas Republicans, at Trump’s urging, redrew congressional maps to potentially flip five Democratic seats to Republican control (AP News). The Texas map systematically dismantles districts where Black and Latino voters had meaningful political influence. Governor Gavin Newsom and California Democrats crafted Proposition 50 as a direct countermeasure, proposing new congressional boundaries that would likely give Democrats five additional seats.
Derrick Johnson, President and CEO of the NAACP, framed the urgency clearly. He stated that California’s Prop 50 represents “a defining moment for Black political power in this country” (NAACP Instagram). Johnson emphasized that when Black voters show up, representation shifts, priorities shift, and Congress reflects the people it serves. The organization has spent $150,000 on radio advertisements across California to mobilize Black voters.
Figure 1: Comparing the Texas and California redistricting battles and their impact on Black political power
Trump’s Texas Power Grab: A Blueprint for Voter Suppression
The story begins in July 2025 when the Trump administration sent a letter to Texas political leaders. The Department of Justice demanded that Texas dismantle congressional districts designed to empower communities of color (Common Cause). Trump pushed for Texas to redraw five congressional districts from Democratic to Republican control. Governor Greg Abbott quickly complied, calling a special legislative session.
Texas Republicans unveiled their new map on July 30, 2025 (Common Cause Texas). The plan targets Democratic and minority communities in major cities including Austin, Houston, Dallas, and South Texas. Consequently, more than 50 Democratic members of the Texas House fled the state in protest, relocating to blue states to deny the chamber the quorum needed to pass the proposed map (Time).
Despite fierce resistance, the Texas Senate approved the GOP congressional map on August 21, 2025, on a party-line vote of 18 to 11 (Texas Tribune). Senator Carol Alvarado had planned to filibuster the map, but Republicans used a rare procedural motion to end debate and kill the filibuster. Some observers were removed from the gallery for shouting “shame” and “fascist” after the vote.
The impact on Black voters is devastating. Democracy Docket analyzed the new Texas map and found it systematically attacks the voting strength of Black and Hispanic communities (Democracy Docket). Although minority groups make up 60 percent of the Texas population, the new map slashes the number of congressional districts where they can elect candidates of their choice from 34 percent down to 21 percent. All eight districts most impacted by the changes had majority-minority populations.
The Historical Pattern: Reconstruction to Jim Crow Redux
This battle echoes a painful historical cycle that Black Americans know too well. Understanding Proposition 50 requires examining how white supremacists have repeatedly used redistricting and gerrymandering to strip away Black political power. The pattern stretches back 150 years.
During Reconstruction, Black men won unprecedented political power. The 15th Amendment, ratified in 1870, granted Black men the right to vote (National Archives). Between 1870 and 1877, approximately 2,000 Black Americans held public office at local, state, and federal levels (Time). Sixteen Black Representatives and two Black Senators served in Congress during this period, all from Southern states.
Figure 2: The rise, fall, and slow recovery of Black political representation in Congress over 155 years
However, white supremacists responded to Black political progress with brutal violence and systematic disenfranchisement. After federal troops withdrew from the South in 1877 as part of the Compromise of 1877, Southern states moved quickly to destroy Black political power (Gilder Lehrman Institute). They employed multiple tactics including poll taxes, literacy tests, grandfather clauses, property qualifications, and outright violence.
Gerrymandering became a staple weapon of white supremacy. Virginia reapportioned city districts in 1883 and amended city charters to minimize or eliminate Black representation on city councils, thereby locking Black Americans out of electoral representation across the state (Gilder Lehrman Institute). Drawing voting district lines to ensure vote dilution of minority voters has remained a persistent tool of suppression for over a century.
The results were catastrophic. In Louisiana, the number of registered Black male voters plummeted from over 130,000 in 1896 to just 1,324 in 1904 (BYU Ballard Brief). By 1892, Mississippi had decreased Black male voter registration from 90 percent to 6 percent, mainly due to Jim Crow laws, poll taxes, and harassment (University of Iowa). After Representative George Henry White of North Carolina left Congress in 1901, it would be 28 years before another Black American won a seat in Congress.
The Voting Rights Act: A Hard-Won Victory Now Under Attack
Black Americans fought for decades to reclaim their political voice. The breakthrough came on August 6, 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law (National Archives). The Act outlawed discriminatory voting practices including literacy tests and poll taxes. Moreover, Section 5 required certain jurisdictions with histories of discrimination to obtain federal approval before changing any voting laws or procedures.
The Voting Rights Act transformed American democracy. In the first decade of federally mandated preclearance practices, the voter registration gap between white and Black voters fell by over 20 points (NAACP Legal Defense Fund). Black voter turnout and Black representation in elected offices increased accordingly. The number of Black Americans in Congress grew from six in 1965 to 13 by 1971, when they founded the Congressional Black Caucus (Congressional Black Caucus Foundation).
Nevertheless, the Supreme Court dealt a devastating blow to voting rights in 2013. In Shelby County v. Holder, a 5-4 conservative majority struck down the coverage formula that determined which jurisdictions were subject to preclearance (Politico). Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that Congress must identify jurisdictions “on a basis that makes sense in light of current conditions” rather than rely on past discrimination. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in dissent that throwing out preclearance “is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”
The consequences were immediate and severe. Just minutes after the Court’s decision, then-Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott bragged on Twitter that the state’s previously-struck down voter ID law should go into effect immediately (NAACP LDF). States previously covered by Section 5 subsequently enacted new voting laws that disproportionately burdened minority voters. By 2020, states like Louisiana, South Carolina, and Texas saw the white-Black turnout gap widen significantly, with white turnout surpassing Black turnout by more than 15 percentage points.
Why Prop 50 Matters: Black Political Power Hangs in the Balance
California’s Proposition 50 represents a defensive move to protect Black political representation. The measure would temporarily replace congressional districts established by an independent citizens’ commission after the 2020 census with new lines drawn by the Democratic-controlled legislature (California Democratic Party). These new districts would remain in effect for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections, then expire when the Citizens Redistricting Commission draws new maps after the next census.
Many Black leaders see Proposition 50 as necessary to neutralize a GOP power grab that endangers bedrock civil rights (Word In Black). Dominik Whitehead of the NAACP stated clearly: “When Donald Trump ordered Governor Abbott to give him additional seats in Congress — further silencing and oppressing the voices of Black people — it became clearer than ever that we have to meet fire with fire” (KTVU).
The NAACP California-Hawaii State Conference emphasized that unlike the Texas map, California’s Proposition 50 does not harm Black or Brown seats (NAACP California-Hawaii). Instead, it strengthens these communities by adding five new districts. The nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California analyzed the measure and refuted claims that Prop 50 would disempower Black voters in some parts of the state.
Figure 3: Essential terms for understanding how voting rights are protected or undermined through redistricting
However, there are valid concerns within the Black community about Proposition 50. Danny J. Bakewell Jr., chairman and executive publisher of the Los Angeles Sentinel, a historically Black newspaper, applauded the initiative but warned the Democratic party not to take the Black vote for granted (Word In Black). He noted that Black voter turnout in the November 2024 presidential election dropped significantly from 2020, as it did for all Californians.
California has a complicated history with ballot propositions affecting Black communities. Voters approved anti-affirmative action Proposition 209 in 1996, strategically described by proponents as a “civil rights initiative.” Last year, voters overwhelmingly supported Proposition 36, which recriminalized certain misdemeanors as felonies in a dramatic swing back to law and order policies that disproportionately impact Black Californians.
The National Implications: A Redistricting War Reshapes American Democracy
Trump’s encouragement for Republicans to redraw congressional districts has sparked an uncommon surge of mid-decade gerrymandering among state legislatures led by both parties (AP News). Democrats need just three additional seats to reclaim control of the House. Trump hopes that redistricting can counter historical patterns where the party of the sitting president typically loses seats during midterm elections.
Beyond Texas and California, Missouri became the second Republican-led state to enact new congressional districts at Trump’s request (AP News). The Missouri map could help Republicans win an additional seat by altering a district held by Democrats in Kansas City. North Carolina became the third Republican-led state to approve new congressional districts, potentially gaining another seat by changing boundaries of a Democratic-held district in eastern North Carolina.
The legal battles are just beginning. Federal judges in El Paso began hearing arguments on October 1, 2025, in a lawsuit challenging Texas’s controversial new congressional map (KUT Austin). Individuals and a coalition of advocacy and civil rights groups argue the newly drawn districts are intentionally gerrymandered to give minority voters less power. Texas argues the map is simply partisan, drawn to give the GOP a political advantage in Congress. This distinction matters because while racial gerrymandering is illegal, the U.S. Supreme Court has said that partisan gerrymandering is legal.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court appears ready to further weaken voting rights protections. During oral arguments on October 14, 2025, in Louisiana v. Callais, the Court’s conservative justices signaled they may undermine a key provision of the Voting Rights Act (SCOTUSblog). The case involves whether Louisiana’s congressional map, which includes an additional majority-Black district to remedy a Voting Rights Act violation, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. A ruling against Louisiana would erase one of the only effective tools available to stop racial gerrymandering and voter suppression.
Why This Matters Today: The Unfinished Fight for Political Equality
Black Americans currently have 66 members in the 119th Congress, representing 12.3 percent of voting members (Congressional Research Service). This marks the highest number ever and represents tremendous progress from the single Black member who served during much of the Jim Crow era. Nevertheless, Black representation in Congress still falls short of the Black population share of approximately 14 percent.
The disparity becomes more stark when examining political power beyond raw numbers. Black voters face ongoing efforts to dilute their influence through gerrymandering, voter ID laws, polling place closures, and other restrictive measures. Since the Shelby County decision in 2013, the voter registration gap between white and Black voters has widened once again (NAACP LDF). In 2022, despite the second largest turnout for a midterm election in 20 years, the gap between turnout of white and Black voters nearly doubled from the previous midterm election.
Proposition 50 matters because it represents resistance to a coordinated national effort to reduce Black political power. Rick Turner, a Black political analyst, wrote that to stand by and allow more of the same is to surrender to authoritarianism in slow motion (Word In Black). Turner emphasized that the safeguards people once believed would protect democracy simply are not holding, especially as the Supreme Court is likely to dismantle the Voting Rights Act entirely in the coming months.
The parallels to history are undeniable. Just as white supremacists responded to Reconstruction-era Black political power with violence and systematic disenfranchisement, today’s attacks on voting rights follow a familiar pattern. Gerrymandering, restrictive voting laws, and court decisions weakening federal protections all serve the same purpose: reducing Black political influence.
For Black Californians and Black Americans nationwide, the outcome of Proposition 50 will signal whether multiracial democracy can defend itself against coordinated attacks. Derrick Johnson of the NAACP stated that what happens in California reverberates across the nation (NAACP Instagram). When Black voters show up, representation shifts, priorities shift, and Congress reflects the people it serves. However, when Black votes are diluted through gerrymandering, the entire nation suffers as Congressional representation becomes less reflective of the people and more responsive to partisan manipulation.
The fight over Proposition 50 is about more than congressional seats. It represents a larger struggle over whether Black political power, won through centuries of sacrifice and struggle, will be protected or dismantled. As California voters head to the polls on November 4, 2025, they carry the weight of this history and the responsibility for shaping the future of Black representation in American democracy.
About the Author
Darius Spearman has been a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.
