A cinematic style scene featuring a close-up of a thoughtful Black woman in her mid-thirties, with medium brown skin and natural hair tied back, standing in the foreground, her expression a mix of concern and determination. She wears a simple white blouse and has a green scarf draped around her neck that symbolizes hope. In the background, a rural Alabama landscape unfolds, with modest homes and overgrown lawns that hint at neglect, framed under a soft, golden hour light that casts a warm glow amidst the shadows of the setting sun. The background subtly showcases a sign reading
Trump ends DEI wastewater settlement in Alabama Black communities, halting environmental justice efforts amid ongoing sewage crisis. (Image generated by DALL-E).

Listen to this article

Download Audio

Trump Ends DEI Wastewater Settlement in AL Black Communities

By Darius Spearman (africanelements)

Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.

Imagine living with raw sewage backing up into your home or pooling in your yard. This isn’t a hypothetical scenario; it’s the reality for many Black families in Lowndes County, Alabama—a landmark 2023 settlement aimed to resolve this crisis once and for all. However, the Trump administration recently terminated this agreement, calling it an “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy” (AfroTech). This decision effectively halts a crucial first step in using federal civil rights law to fight environmental injustice (Inside Climate News; Environmental Health News; Planetizen).

The administration cited a purported January 20, 2025, executive order as the reason for ending federal Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs (AfroTech; Department of Justice; Planetizen). They framed the move as being in the “national interest,” prioritizing this vague concept over addressing documented racial inequities in basic sanitation. Consequently, this action casts serious doubt on the future of federal support for these suffering communities.

Trump DEI Policy Alabama: Settlement Scrapped

The decision to end the settlement wasn’t made in a vacuum. It directly stems from the administration’s stance against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The Department of Justice explicitly cited President Trump’s executive order targeting federal DEI programs as the justification for terminating the Lowndes County agreement (AfroTech; Department of Justice). This move positions the fight for basic sanitation in Black communities as a casualty of a broader political battle against equity-focused policies.

By labeling the settlement an “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy,” the administration essentially reframed a public health and civil rights issue as a matter of political ideology (AfroTech). This ignores the documented history of neglect and the specific environmental challenges faced by these majority-Black areas. Rather than viewing the settlement as a remedy for discrimination, it was painted as an improper use of federal resources. This decision, therefore, prioritizes the dismantling of DEI frameworks over the tangible needs of citizens exposed to hazardous conditions.

Reasons Cited for Settlement Termination

“Illegal DEI Policy”
The settlement was framed as an improper Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiative.
Executive Order
Justified by a Jan. 20, 2025, executive order allegedly ending federal DEI programs.
“National Interest”
Positioned as aligning with “national interest” over specific racial equity goals.
Data points reflect the administration’s justification for ending the Alabama wastewater settlement. Source: AfroTech, DOJ

Alabama Black Belt Sewage Crisis: A Lingering Problem

For generations, residents in Alabama’s Black Belt, particularly Lowndes County, have endured a devastating sewage crisis (Inside Climate News; Environmental Health News). Failing septic systems and a near-total lack of adequate wastewater infrastructure mean that many families live with daily exposure to raw sewage. Waste often discharges directly into yards or even backs up inside homes, creating constant health hazards (AfroTech).

This isn’t just about faulty pipes; it’s deeply intertwined with the region’s environment and economy. The area’s dense, impermeable clay soil makes traditional septic systems largely ineffective and very expensive to install or repair (Inside Climate News; Planetizen). Combined with high poverty rates, families are often unable to afford the specialized, costly systems needed. Consequently, these sanitation disparities persist, highlighting a stark contrast between conditions in these rural, majority-Black communities and more affluent, often whiter, urban areas.

Defining Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)

DEI Icon

DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion): This term refers to policies and practices aimed at creating fair and just systems where everyone, especially those from historically marginalized groups, feels represented, supported, and treated equitably. In the context of sustainability and the environment, DEI means ensuring that communities facing the brunt of problems like pollution or lack of infrastructure are central to finding solutions (Earth Day).

DEI efforts focus on amplifying voices, particularly Black and BIPOC voices, investing in environmental justice, and making sure underserved communities benefit from climate action and environmental policies (Earth Day). Many organizations and institutions integrate DEI to foster better decision-making and address intersecting environmental, economic, and social inequities (Greenly; UCLA Sustainability; Witty Works).

DEI definition synthesized from multiple sources explaining its role in sustainability and equity. Sources: Earth Day, Greenly, UCLA, Witty Works

Understanding Environmental Justice Rural Sanitation

The situation in Lowndes County is a textbook example of environmental injustice. Environmental justice is the principle that all people, regardless of race or income, deserve equal protection from environmental harms and equal access to environmental benefits. Crucially, it addresses the systemic racial and economic biases that lead to disproportionate burdens, like pollution exposure or inadequate infrastructure, falling on marginalized communities (Earth Day).

Research, like that from Dr. Robert Bullard, has long shown how BIPOC communities historically bear the brunt of environmental risks, often due to the placement of toxic facilities or neglect of essential services (Earth Day). The raw sewage crisis in Alabama’s Black Belt, stemming from failed infrastructure and lack of investment, perfectly illustrates this injustice. Furthermore, addressing these issues involves advocating for policies that prioritize the needs and rights of underserved communities, ensuring equitable access to essential resources such as clean water and safe sanitation (Piedmont Environmental Council).

What is Environmental Justice?

Environmental Justice Icon

Environmental Justice: This concept tackles the unfair distribution of environmental burdens based on race and income. It highlights how marginalized communities, often Black and BIPOC communities, face higher exposure to pollution, toxic waste, inadequate infrastructure (like sanitation systems), and climate change impacts (Earth Day). It also involves ensuring these communities have a voice in decisions affecting their environment.

Examples like the Flint water crisis or the siting of waste facilities predominantly in minority neighborhoods demonstrate environmental injustice (Earth Day). Achieving environmental justice means correcting these systemic inequities and ensuring fair treatment and meaningful involvement for all people regarding environmental laws, regulations, and policies (Piedmont Environmental Council).

Definition highlights the core principles of environmental justice and its connection to racial inequity. Sources: Earth Day, PEC

Federal Civil Rights Environmental Law Tested

The terminated settlement was more than just a local agreement; it was historic. It marked the first time federal civil rights law was used to specifically address environmental justice issues related to sanitation (AfroTech; Inside Climate News; Environmental Health News; Planetizen). This groundbreaking approach, initiated under the Biden administration, offered a potential new avenue for communities facing similar neglect nationwide.

The conditions in Alabama’s Black Belt had already drawn international attention. A 2017 United Nations report by Philip Alston, then the special rapporteur on extreme poverty, explicitly linked the sewage crisis to systemic racism and state inaction (Inside Climate News; Planetizen). The federal settlement represented a long-overdue acknowledgment and attempt to rectify this deep-seated injustice using civil rights enforcement. Consequently, its termination is not just a setback for Lowndes County, but it also potentially dims the prospects for using this legal tool elsewhere.

Community Leaders Condemn Wastewater Settlement Termination

The decision to end the settlement drew sharp criticism from those who have been fighting for sanitation justice for years. Catherine Coleman Flowers, a MacArthur Genius Grant recipient and founder of the Center for Rural Enterprise and Environmental Justice, has long highlighted the crisis in Lowndes County. She emphasized that this is a universal issue requiring broader federal action on rural sanitation, not something to be dismissed under a political label (AfroTech; Inside Climate News; Environmental Health News).

U.S. Rep. Terri Sewell, who represents the district including Lowndes County, forcefully condemned the termination. She stated plainly that the settlement addressed a critical public health crisis impacting her constituents, not DEI preferences (Inside Climate News; Environmental Health News). Furthermore, Barry Brock of the Southern Environmental Law Center described the administration’s decision as both “arbitrary and inhumane,” stressing the real-world consequences of revoking commitments for basic sanitation infrastructure (Environmental Health News). Rep. Sewell vowed to continue fighting for the necessary resources despite this setback.

Voices of Opposition: Reactions to the Termination

Catherine Coleman Flowers
Founder, Cntr for Rural Enterprise & Env. Justice
Called for broader federal action, emphasizing the universal urgency of rural sanitation.
Rep. Terri Sewell (D-AL)
U.S. Representative
Condemned termination, stating it addressed a public health crisis, not DEI; vowed to keep fighting.
Barry Brock
Director, Southern Environmental Law Center (AL)
Criticized the decision as “arbitrary and inhumane,” highlighting the stakes of revoking sanitation commitments.
Summaries of reactions from key figures opposing the settlement termination. Sources: AfroTech, Inside Climate News, EHN

What Happens Now? Environmental Justice Uncertain

With the federal settlement terminated, the path forward for addressing the Lowndes County sewage crisis is unclear. Alabama state health officials have indicated that they will continue to install some septic systems using existing funds (Environmental Health News; Planetizen). However, they also stressed the limitations of their resources and authority to implement the kind of comprehensive, long-term solutions the region desperately needs.

The Department of Justice, meanwhile, has not offered any alternative plan to ensure adequate access to sanitation, either in Alabama or nationwide (Inside Climate News; Environmental Health News). This lack of clarity leaves advocates and residents uncertain about the federal government’s commitment to tackling environmental justice issues in rural communities. Consequently, the termination raises serious questions about whether systemic problems, such as the one in Lowndes County, will continue to be ignored or deprioritized under the banner of opposing DEI.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Darius Spearman is a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College, where he has been teaching since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.