Boko Haram 2025: Maiduguri Security & Implications

By Darius Spearman (africanelements)

Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.

Alarm Bells Ring: Maiduguri Security Crisis Worsens

Troubling signs point to a serious Boko Haram comeback in Nigeria. Borno State Governor Babagana Zulum has raised concerns about the resurgence in 2025. He paints a grim picture of daily attacks and insurgents reclaiming territory. His warnings highlight a disturbing reality on the ground for our brothers and sisters in northeastern Nigeria. Indeed, the situation seems to be deteriorating rapidly.

Governor Zulum specifically stated that Boko Haram now carries out kidnappings and attacks “almost daily without confrontation” (Crushing Boko Haram’s resurgence – Punch Newspapers; Nigerian governor warns of Boko Haram comeback – MyJoyOnline). This lack of pushback suggests the military might be losing the momentum previously gained. Furthermore, the Shehu of Borno confirmed that three local government areas (Guzamala, Marte, Abbadam) and parts of Mobbar are effectively under Boko Haram control (Crushing Boko Haram’s resurgence – Punch Newspapers). These are not just isolated incidents; they represent a significant erosion of government authority in these areas.

The danger hit close to home for the governor himself. In March 2025, insurgents ambushed Zulum’s security convoy. They also raided two military bases around the same time (Fears of Boko Haram comeback stir in Nigerian birthplace of Maiduguri – The Guardian). These bold moves stir deep fears about Boko Haram potentially recapturing significant territory, putting countless lives at risk once more.

Evolving Tactics Mark Boko Haram 2025 Attacks

This resurgence isn’t just about brute force; Boko Haram is demonstrating more sophisticated methods. They are adapting their strategies, making the fight against them even more challenging. Security analyst Bulama Bukarti noted that the group reportedly uses unmanned drones to spy on military positions in the North-East (Crushing Boko Haram’s resurgence – Punch Newspapers). This technological leap allows them to gather intelligence and plan attacks more effectively, therefore posing a greater threat.

The insurgents are also employing asymmetric warfare, using unconventional tactics to target both civilians and security forces. A devastating example occurred in April 2025 when an IED attack on the busy Maiduguri-Damboa highway killed eight civilians and injured 21 (Crushing Boko Haram’s resurgence – Punch Newspapers). This incident shows a renewed focus on urban areas and civilian populations, spreading fear far beyond the immediate conflict zones. Consequently, understanding these tactics is crucial for developing effective counter-strategies.

History offers a chilling blueprint for their current ambitions. During 2014–2015, Boko Haram managed to seize significant territory, even declaring a so-called caliphate in Gwoza (Boko Haram insurgency – Wikipedia; Beyond Maiduguri: Understanding Boko Haram’s rule in rural communities – POMEPS). This previous expansion likely informs their current strategy, which aims to replicate past successes and reestablish control over parts of northeastern Nigeria.

Regional Cracks & Nigeria Jihadist Resurgence

The fight against Boko Haram isn’t just Nigeria’s burden; it requires strong regional cooperation. Unfortunately, recent events have weakened this united front. Niger’s withdrawal from the Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) in March 2025 dealt a significant blow (Fears of Boko Haram comeback stir in Nigerian birthplace of Maiduguri – The Guardian). This exit disrupted vital intelligence sharing and reduced the number of troops available on Borno’s front lines, essentially creating gaps that insurgents could exploit.

The MNJTF, comprising forces from Nigeria, Chad, Cameroon, and formerly Niger, had made critical territorial gains against Boko Haram between 2015 and 2016 (Stabilizing Northeast Nigeria After Boko Haram – Carnegie Endowment). Niger’s departure risks reversing these hard-won victories due to fragmented regional coordination. Moreover, Nigerian troops are already stretched thin. They are simultaneously engaged in counter-banditry operations in the country’s northwest (Nigerian governor warns of Boko Haram comeback – MyJoyOnline). This diversion of resources leaves forces in Borno potentially undermanned and vulnerable, thus making the resurgence even more challenging to contain.

Human Cost: The Deepening Borno State Insurgency

Maiduguri, the heart of Borno State, bears the heavy weight of this protracted conflict. The city has become a refuge, but also a pressure cooker. Since 2014, Maiduguri’s population has ballooned from around 1 million to 2 million due to the massive influx of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) fleeing violence (Maiduguri – African Cities Research Consortium). This surge has put immense strain on the city’s already limited infrastructure, water, and services, creating dire living conditions for many.

The conflict has inflicted unimaginable loss, particularly on vulnerable communities. Between 2009 and 2015 alone, estimates suggest over 5,000 Catholics were killed in Borno State. This violence left behind a devastating legacy: 7,000 widows and 10,000 orphans within that community (Boko Haram in Nigeria: Statistical Trends and Social Implications). Currently, Maiduguri hosts over 300,000 IDPs, many living in precarious conditions (Maiduguri – African Cities Research Consortium; The IDP situation in Borno State, Nigeria – returning to uncertainty?). Compounding these challenges, environmental issues such as flooding and desertification exacerbate water scarcity, forcing people into high-risk areas (Maiduguri, African Cities Research Consortium). Therefore, the humanitarian crisis is intertwined with the security situation.

Military Response & Lingering Questions: A Boko Haram Comeback?

While Governor Zulum raises alarms, the Nigerian military presents a different narrative. Military spokespersons have pushed back against warnings of governance failures. They insist that troops are making “sacrifices” to combat the insurgents (Fears of Boko Haram comeback stir in Nigerian birthplace of Maiduguri – The Guardian). This official stance contrasts sharply with the reports of daily attacks and territorial losses coming from state officials.

However, the military’s history in the counterinsurgency campaign is complex and fraught with criticism. During the earlier phases (2009–2014), security forces were accused of serious human rights abuses. These included extrajudicial killings, torture, and forced displacements (Boko Haram insurgency – Wikipedia). Such actions risk alienating the very communities whose cooperation is needed to defeat the insurgency. Furthermore, tragic operational errors, like the 2017 airstrike that mistakenly killed 115 IDPs in Rann (Boko Haram insurgency – Wikipedia), have raised persistent questions about competence and accountability, thereby complicating efforts to build trust.

Factional Dynamics: ISWAP, Boko Haram & Nigeria Jihadist Resurgence

The landscape of extremism in northeastern Nigeria is not monolithic. Boko Haram itself has fractured, most significantly with the rise of the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). This split complicates counterterrorism efforts. ISWAP, which broke away in 2016, often employs different tactics and strategies than the faction previously led by Abubakar Shekau (who died in 2021) (The Aftermath of the Boko Haram Resurgence; Beyond Maiduguri: Understanding Boko Haram’s rule in rural communities – POMEPS).

ISWAP has shown significant cross-border capability, launching attacks in neighboring Niger and Cameroon in 2025 (Boko Haram insurgency – Wikipedia). This demonstrates a regional reach that poses a broader threat. While internal clashes sometimes erupt between ISWAP and remnants of the original Boko Haram (The Boko Haram insurgency is moving back to Maiduguri), this fragmentation doesn’t necessarily weaken the overall insurgency. Instead, it diversifies the threats security forces must confront. Interestingly, ISWAP has focused more on establishing forms of governance, like tax collection, in rural areas it controls (Beyond Maiduguri: Understanding Boko Haram’s rule in rural communities – POMEPS). This contrasts with the Shekau faction’s historical focus on urban bombings and indiscriminate violence, thus presenting a different kind of challenge to state authority.

Future Implications: A Region on Edge

The resurgence of Boko Haram and ISWAP activity in 2025 casts a long shadow over the future of northeastern Nigeria and the wider Lake Chad region. If the current trends of increased attacks, territorial gains, and sophisticated tactics continue, the consequences could be devastating. The conflict risks becoming even more prolonged and entrenched, further destabilizing an already fragile area.

The human cost could continue to spiral. Projections suggest the number of IDPs could reach 2 million by 2026 if the violence escalates (The Aftermath of the Boko Haram Resurgence). This would place an unbearable strain on host communities, such as Maiduguri, and overwhelm humanitarian aid efforts. Ultimately, addressing this renewed threat requires more than just military action; it demands effective governance, regional cooperation, and a focus on the root causes that allowed the insurgency to take hold in the first place.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Darius Spearman is a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College, where he has been teaching since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.