Justice for Joppy: A Landmark Verdict
By Darius Spearman (africanelements)
Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.
A Nurse’s Fight for Justice
DonQuenick Joppy, a Black ICU nurse, recently won a significant $20 million award from a federal jury. This verdict came after she sued HCA-HealthOne LLC, the parent company of The Medical Center of Aurora (nurse.org). Joppy’s lawsuit, filed in April 2022, alleged racial discrimination, retaliation, and malicious prosecution. These claims stemmed from her firing in 2019, which followed the death of a 93-year-old patient (nurse.org).
The core of the dispute centered on Joppy’s role in the end-of-life care for a patient whose family had decided to withdraw life support (nurse.org). Joppy stated she followed a respiratory therapist’s instructions to withdraw the patient from the ventilator (nurse.org). However, the hospital claimed Joppy acted outside her scope of practice by turning off the ventilator, potentially causing the patient to suffer (nurse.org). Interestingly, a medical examiner later determined the patient died of natural causes (nurse.org).
The Weight of False Accusations
The Colorado Attorney General’s Office filed serious charges against Joppy, including manslaughter and negligent death (nurse.org). These charges were a heavy burden for Joppy. Thankfully, they were later dropped in September 2021 “in the interest of justice” (nurse.org). Joppy’s attorney, Jennifer Robinson, highlighted the immense personal toll this ordeal took on her client. Joppy became “pretty much homeless” and struggled to find employment as a nurse with such a history (nurse.org). This situation underscores the severe consequences false accusations can have on a person’s life and career.
Joppy maintained her innocence throughout this difficult period, stating, “I never killed anyone. I’m a great nurse” (nurse.org). Her life was “turned upside down” by these events (nurse.org). The jury’s verdict, which included a substantial $15 million in punitive damages, strongly suggests they found the hospital’s conduct to be exceptionally egregious (denverpost.com). This large award is not typical for employment discrimination cases, further emphasizing the severity of the hospital’s actions in the eyes of the court (denverpost.com).
Unveiling Workplace Discrimination
Joppy alleged that the hospital’s actions were retaliatory, stemming from her complaints about racial discrimination and mistreatment by staff (antiracismnursing.org). She described experiencing “verbal and nonverbal slights and microaggressions designed to marginalize, segregate, and undermine her based on stereotypical and harmful views of Black professionals” (antiracismnursing.org). Joppy cited instances of being yelled at and criticized by charge nurses, particularly Lindsay Jordan, in a humiliating and demeaning manner (antiracismnursing.org). She claimed this treatment did not happen to non-Black nurses (antiracismnursing.org).
Moreover, Joppy reported an incident where Charge Nurse Michael Oleszczuk allegedly told her she should “clean his house and clip his dog’s toe nails” (antiracismnursing.org). He also denied her training opportunities, stating she lacked “much deeper critical thinking and much better organizational skills” (antiracismnursing.org). These examples paint a picture of a hostile work environment. Joppy was also restricted to one section of the ICU and denied access to the locker room or main break room after a white patient’s family falsely accused her of stealing a credit card (antiracismnursing.org). Additionally, she was tasked with caring for up to three critically ill patients without backup, while non-Black nurses cared for only two, leading her to feel isolated and occupationally segregated (antiracismnursing.org).
Understanding Racial Discrimination
Unfair treatment based on race
Racial discrimination includes direct actions, subtle biases (microaggressions), and systemic practices that disadvantage people based on racial background. In workplaces, it can appear as unequal treatment, denied opportunities, or a hostile environment.
Common types
- Direct: Explicit racial slurs or differential rules.
- Indirect: Neutral policies that disproportionately harm a racial group.
- Microaggressions: Everyday slights that signal bias.
- Systemic: Structures and norms that embed inequality.
Workplace signs
- Unequal hiring, pay, or promotion opportunities.
- Retaliation after reporting concerns.
- Hostile environment or disparate discipline.
- Lack of accommodations or biased performance reviews.
The Hospital’s Defense and the Jury’s Verdict
HCA-HealthOne denied all allegations of malicious conduct, hostile work environment, discrimination, or retaliation (scribd.com). The hospital stated Joppy was terminated for “her failure to follow policies and protocols designed to provide patients with dignity, safety, and comfort during end-of-life care, and for practicing outside the scope of her practice” (scribd.com). They also asserted that their report to the state health department was a statutory obligation and that they did not support the criminal prosecution of caregivers for mistakes (scribd.com).
Despite the hospital’s defense, the jury found that Joppy had proven the hospital terminated her in retaliation for her complaints about race discrimination (nurse.org). The jury awarded Joppy $20 million: $5 million in compensatory damages and $15 million in punitive damages (nurse.org). Joppy’s attorney, Jennifer Robinson, stated that the verdict represents “a measure of justice after years of discrimination, retaliation, and false accusations” (nurse.org). Joppy herself expressed hope that the verdict would encourage hospitals to take concerns of frontline nurses seriously and ensure workplaces are free from racial discrimination (nurse.org).
DonQuenick Joppy’s $20 Million Verdict Breakdown
The Road Ahead: Appeal and Broader Implications
HCA-HealthOne plans to appeal the verdict (nurse.org). A spokesperson for HCA-HealthOne stated they “strongly disagree with the outcome of this trial and will appeal” (nurse.org). The hospital maintains that Joppy “chose to turn off the ventilator on a living patient, which was outside the scope of her nursing license and not the standard of care for end-of-life patients” (nurse.org). This appeal means the legal battle is not yet over for Joppy.
This case highlights broader issues of racial discrimination and retaliation in healthcare (atlantablackstar.com). Another recent case involved a Black nurse whose contract was terminated after she exposed a doctor’s outburst in a viral video, suggesting a pattern of hospitals taking action against nurses who report issues (atlantablackstar.com). These cases underscore the urgent need for systemic change within the healthcare industry to protect nurses and ensure equitable treatment for all, regardless of race.
Impact of Racial Discrimination on Nurses
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Darius Spearman has been a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.
