Listen to this article
Download AudioPolice Misconduct: Revenge Vow in Mississippi Traffic Stop
By Darius Spearman (africanelements)
Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.
The words “I’m going to f_ck him anyway I can” are chilling. They become even more disturbing when spoken by a police officer about a citizen. This alleged threat, caught on video during a minor traffic stop in Mississippi, has once again pulled back the curtain on the troubling interactions many Black individuals face with law enforcement. The case of McNeal Gaddis raises serious questions about police misconduct and the abuse of power. Consequently, it demands a closer look at the system meant to protect and serve.
A Vow of Retaliation: Mississippi Officer’s Disturbing Threat
In Ridgeland, Mississippi, a traffic stop quickly escalated beyond a simple citation. McNeal Gaddis, a Black man, found himself the target of a police officer’s anger. The officer allegedly vowed revenge because Gaddis “mouthed off” (Atlanta Black Star). Recorded video captured the officer stating, “I’m going to f_ck him anyway I can,” referring to Gaddis. This statement alone highlights a deeply personal and retaliatory mindset. Such a mindset is dangerous when held by someone with the authority to detain and arrest.
The situation worsened when the officer threatened to charge Gaddis with resisting arrest. This threat came despite video evidence showing Gaddis complying with commands and placing his hands behind his back (Atlanta Black Star). Gaddis, an Army veteran with eight years of service, acknowledged he might have acted differently. However, he firmly stated his constitutional rights were violated. He clarified his stance, saying he is not anti-law enforcement, but opposes officers who disregard these fundamental rights. The Ridgeland Police Department did acknowledge the incident. Chief Brian Myers stated the officers involved would be disciplined for unprofessional behavior, emphasizing that the department aims to “police their own” and maintain professionalism. Nevertheless, the chief also mentioned the video was “highly edited and clipped,” though he confirmed inappropriate statements were made.
The Gaddis Traffic Stop: Key Events
Citizen’s Actions & Perspective
McNeal Gaddis “mouthed off” during a minor traffic stop.
Video shows him complying by placing hands behind his back.
A military veteran, Gaddis felt his constitutional rights were violated.
Officer’s Response & Allegations
Officer allegedly said: “I’m going to f_ck him anyway I can.”
Threatened Gaddis with resisting arrest charges despite compliance.
Ridgeland PD acknowledged unprofessional behavior but also claimed video was “highly edited.”
More Than Words: “Mouthing Off” & Resisting Arrest Laws
The term “mouthing off” is subjective. It often describes verbal defiance or insubordination. In everyday life, it might be seen as rude. However, in legal terms, simply “mouthing off” to an officer does not automatically justify a resisting arrest charge (FindLaw). Compliance with orders, like putting hands behind one’s back, is often separate from the tone of a verbal exchange. The context and intent behind words are critical. For many in our community, asserting one’s rights or questioning an officer’s actions can be misconstrued as “mouthing off.” This interpretation, unfortunately, sometimes leads to escalated situations.
Resisting arrest legally involves intentionally preventing an officer from making an arrest. This can include using or threatening physical force, creating a substantial risk of injury, or even passive physical resistance (ARS § 13-2508). Examples include pulling away, refusing to exit a vehicle, or going limp (Tobin Law Office). Importantly, whether the arrest itself is lawful doesn’t change the illegality of resisting. Still, verbal challenges alone usually don’t meet this threshold. The sentiment that “cop feelings are not laws” (Threads) underscores that an officer’s emotional reaction should not dictate legal consequences. Their actions must align with objective legal standards, not personal offense.
Understanding Resisting Arrest
Resisting Arrest (ARS § 13-2508): This involves intentionally preventing or trying to prevent a law enforcement officer from making an arrest. It’s not just about words.
Actions that may count as resisting arrest include:
Simply “mouthing off” or verbally challenging an officer, especially while otherwise complying, typically does not meet the legal standard for this charge. Officer’s feelings or offense are not the measure.
A Pattern of Fear: Traffic Stops and Racial Profiling
The Gaddis incident is not isolated. It echoes other disturbing encounters Black drivers face in Mississippi and across the nation. Consider the case of another Black man, Feaste. He was pulled over twice in just one hour in Mississippi due to false tailgating accusations (Atlanta Black Star). Bodycam footage reportedly proved his innocence. It also showed deputies acting improperly. These repeated stops for minor or baseless reasons create an environment of anxiety for Black drivers. Every traffic stop holds the potential for escalation or injustice.
Feaste alleged he was unlawfully detained. He also claimed deputies tried to fabricate charges to send him to prison (Atlanta Black Star). The bodycam evidence, according to reports, showed deputies harassing Feaste because he exercised his rights and stood firm against wrongful accusations. Such incidents illustrate a troubling pattern. They suggest a misuse of police power during traffic stops, particularly against Black individuals. Minor infractions like tailgating can become pretexts. They can lead to deeper scrutiny and, as alleged in Feaste’s case, attempts to create more serious charges. Ultimately, these experiences erode trust between our communities and law enforcement.
The National Crisis: Police Misconduct and Black Lives
These Mississippi cases reflect a much larger, national crisis. For generations, Black Americans have faced disproportionate police violence and misconduct. Many have been killed or subjected to excessive force by law enforcement, even when unarmed (Wikipedia). These are not just statistics; they are lives cut short, families shattered, and communities left grieving. The fear of police encounters is a heavy burden carried by many in the Black community. It is a fear rooted in a long history of systemic racism and police brutality.
A documented list highlights numerous cases of unarmed African Americans killed by law enforcement in the U.S. (Wikipedia). This grim tally emphasizes the profound risk Black people face during interactions with police. Sometimes, these fatal encounters are triggered by something as common as a minor traffic stop. Therefore, incidents like the one involving McNeal Gaddis are not seen in isolation. They are part of a wider, disturbing pattern of racial disparities in police treatment across the country. Addressing this requires more than just focusing on individual “bad apples.” It means confronting the systemic issues that allow such misconduct to persist.
The Perilous Reality: Unarmed Black Americans & Law Enforcement
Encounters with law enforcement carry a disproportionate risk for Black Americans. Documented cases reveal numerous unarmed African Americans have been killed by police in the U.S., often stemming from minor incidents like traffic stops. This highlights a systemic issue of racial disparity in policing outcomes.
Seeking Justice: Police Accountability & The Path Forward
When police departments, like Ridgeland’s, promise “disciplinary action,” many ask what that truly means. Will it be a slap on the wrist, or genuine consequences that deter future misconduct? Transparency in these processes is vital for community trust. Chief Myers stated the Ridgeland police “police their own” (Atlanta Black Star). For this to be effective, the outcomes of such internal policing must be clear and publicly verifiable. Without it, skepticism remains.
The claim of “highly edited and clipped” video (Atlanta Black Star) also raises concerns about narrative control. While video can be manipulated, the swift release of full, unedited footage by police departments can help clarify events. In too many cases involving police misconduct, crucial constitutional rights are violated. The 4th Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The 5th Amendment protects against self-incrimination. These rights are fundamental. McNeal Gaddis, the military veteran, emphasized this, highlighting that his concern was about his rights being disregarded. Ultimately, true accountability and professionalism in policing are essential to bridge the gap between law enforcement and the communities they serve, particularly the Black community.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Darius Spearman is a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College, where he has been teaching since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.
