**A cinematic style scene** with dramatic chiaroscuro lighting, casting sharp contrasts between light and shadow. In the foreground, a close-up of a young Black woman (dark skin tone, mid-20s) gazes determinedly forward, her brow furrowed in resolve. She holds a weathered parchment labeled “TITLE VI” in one hand, its edges illuminated by a faint golden glow, while her other hand rests protectively over a stack of books titled “DEI Initiatives.” Behind her, a university campus fades into muted twilight, its pillars partially obscured by creeping shadows that claw at faded posters reading “EQUITY NOW.” The background blends archival sketches of protest marches into the architecture, symbolizing historical struggle. Moody amber and indigo hues dominate the palette, emphasizing tension between perseverance and erasure.
Trump’s Anti-DEI Crackdown Hits Universities: Federal probes target 45+ colleges over Title VI violations impacting race-based scholarships and DEI programs. (Image generated by DALL-E).

Listen to this article

Download Audio

Trump’s Anti-DEI Crackdown Hits Universities

By Darius Spearman (africanelements)

Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.

Who’s Under Investigation?

45
Colleges with PhD Project partnerships
6
Schools for race-based scholarships
1
University for segregation programs
Federal investigation data via Axios and LiveNow Fox.

45 Colleges Face Federal DEI Probes

In March 2025, the U.S. Department of Education launched investigations into 45 colleges with DEI programs linked to The PhD Project. The initiative—aimed at increasing faculty diversity in business schools—was labeled “discriminatory” for allegedly restricting mentorship to students of color. High-profile schools like MIT, Yale, and Arizona State are among those under scrutiny (Axios).

Six other universities face probes over race-based scholarships granting money only to minority applicants. Meanwhile, one school was accused of running a program that “segregates students.” Federal officials argue that such policies violate Title VI, bans racial exclusion in federally funded activities. For example, the PhD Project’s website states its mission is to diversify academia, but critics claim this excludes white candidates (LiveNow Fox).

How Title VI Enforcement Works

1
Investigate programs accused of racial exclusion (e.g., scholarships restricting eligibility).
2
Determine if policies violate the Civil Rights Act’s ban on discrimination.
3
Impose penalties—like funding cuts—if schools don’t comply with federal guidelines.
Process details from the DOJ and EPA.

How Title VI Shapes DEI Enforcement

Title VI mandates that federally funded institutions—including universities—don’t discriminate based on race. The 1964 Civil Rights Act provision recently became a key tool to challenge DEI initiatives. Federal officials now argue that programs like racially exclusive scholarships or mentorship violate equal treatment rules (DOJ).

For instance, the Department of Education claims that the PhD Project’s focus on Black, Latino, and Native American scholars amounts to illegal exclusion. However, the program’s supporters say it corrects systemic underrepresentation in faculty ranks. Ohio State—one of the schools under review—argues its policies follow “neutral, race-blind standards” (PBS).

Potential Consequences of Noncompliance

Loss of Federal Funding
Schools could lose millions in grants if investigations confirm violations (Axios).
Program Suspensions
Dozens of scholarships and DEI initiatives may be paused or restructured.
Lawsuits
The DOJ may sue universities refusing to comply, triggering lengthy legal battles (DOJ).
Penalty risks were reported by Chalkbeat.

Impact on Students and Campus Diversity

Scholarships reserved for students of color—like Florida A&M’s $10,000 Black Scholars Fund—are now at risk. If banned, beneficiaries may lose critical financial aid. Meanwhile, DEI offices nationwide are scaling back mentorship programs amid legal uncertainty (PBS).

However, supporters of the crackdown argue that “colorblind” policies ensure fairness. For example, a Louisiana court recently blocked federal agencies from penalizing schools over “disparate impact” policies that are not explicitly race-based. Critics counter that this ignores systemic barriers minority students still face (DOJ).

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Darius Spearman has been a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.