Curtis Lee Ervin: Death Row Inmate’s Conviction Overturned Due to Racial Bias in Jury Selection
By Darius Spearman (africanelements)
Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.

The Case of Curtis Lee Ervin: A 33-Year Journey on California’s Death Row
The Murder-for-Hire Conviction
Curtis Lee Ervin’s life took a dark turn in 1991. At 38 years old, he was convicted of a 1986 murder-for-hire in Alameda County, California. The victim was Carlene McDonald, the ex-wife of Ervin’s co-defendant, Robert McDonald. The jury found Ervin guilty, and he was sentenced to death (KTVU).
But the story didn’t end there. For the next 33 years, Ervin sat on California’s death row. He always said he was innocent. Now, at 71 years old, Ervin might finally get a chance to prove it.
A Federal Judge’s Ruling
In a shocking turn of events, a federal judge has ordered Ervin’s release or retrial. The judge gave the Alameda County prosecutor’s office 60 days to make a choice. They can either retry Ervin or set him free (Black News).
This ruling has sent shockwaves through the legal community. It’s not often that a death row inmate gets a second chance after so many years. But why did the judge make this decision?
Prosecutorial Misconduct: The Heart of the Matter
Racial Bias in Jury Selection
The key issue in Ervin’s case is racial bias in jury selection. Ervin’s legal team argued that prosecutors wrongly kept Black people off the jury. This goes against the rules set by a famous Supreme Court case called Batson v. Kentucky (Atlanta Black Star).
The numbers are striking. Out of 11 possible Black jurors, 9 were sent home. This left a mostly white jury to decide the fate of a Black man accused of killing a white woman. The racial dynamics of the case can’t be ignored.
The State Attorney General’s Office Weighs In
The State Attorney General’s office took a close look at Ervin’s case. What they found was troubling. They said the district attorney at the time didn’t just exclude Black jurors. Jewish jurors were also kept off the jury. This kind of discrimination is against the law (KTVU).
- The district attorney excluded Black jurors
- Jewish jurors were also kept off the jury
- This discrimination violates constitutional rights
The Broader Issue: Innocence on Death Row
A Pattern of Injustice
Ervin’s case is not unique. Across the country, innocent people have spent decades on death row. The Death Penalty Information Center lists four such cases:
- Glenn Ford: 30 years on death row in Louisiana
- Peter Limone: 33 years on death row in Massachusetts
- Gary Drinkard: 30 years on death row in Alabama
- Tony Egbuna Ford: 30 years on death row in Texas
These men lost years of their lives due to prosecutorial misconduct, racial bias, false testimony, and lack of evidence (Death Penalty Information Center).
The Human Cost
The toll on these wrongly convicted individuals is hard to imagine. They’ve spent decades behind bars, always knowing that death could come at any time. For Curtis Lee Ervin, that’s 33 years of his life. His attorney, Pamala Sayasane, said Ervin was in disbelief when he heard the news. After so long, hope can be hard to hold onto (Black News).
Legal Rights and the Death Penalty: A Closer Look
The Batson v. Kentucky Case
The Batson v. Kentucky case is key to understanding Ervin’s situation. This 1986 Supreme Court case said that prosecutors can’t keep people off juries just because of their race. It’s a cornerstone of fair trials in the U.S. When prosecutors break this rule, it’s a serious violation of a defendant’s rights (Atlanta Black Star).
In Ervin’s case, the evidence of racial bias in jury selection was strong enough to overturn his conviction. This shows how important the Batson ruling is, even decades after it was made.
The Role of the California Supreme Court
The California Supreme Court plays a big part in death penalty cases. They review these cases to make sure everything was done right. In Ervin’s case, they agreed that there were serious problems with how the jury was picked.
- The court looks for any legal errors in death penalty cases
- They check if the defendant’s rights were respected
- Their ruling can mean life or death for the accused
The Future for Curtis Lee Ervin
The Possibility of a Retrial
Now, Ervin faces an uncertain future. The Alameda County prosecutor’s office has to decide if they want to try him again. If they do, Ervin will get a new trial. This time, it should be with a fairly selected jury. But after 33 years, will they be able to put together a strong case?
If they choose not to retry Ervin, he’ll be set free. After more than three decades on death row, he’d have to adjust to a whole new world. It’s a daunting prospect for anyone, let alone a 71-year-old man.
Implications for Other Death Row Cases
Ervin’s case could have big effects on other death row inmates. It shows that even decades-old convictions can be overturned if there was misconduct. This might give hope to others who say they were wrongly convicted.
It also puts pressure on prosecutors to be more careful. They need to make sure they’re following all the rules when picking juries. If they don’t, their convictions might not stand up years later.
Conclusion: The Ongoing Fight for Justice
Curtis Lee Ervin’s case shines a light on serious problems in our justice system. Racial bias, prosecutorial misconduct, and the death penalty are all under scrutiny. As Ervin waits to hear if he’ll be retried, his story reminds us that the fight for justice is never over.
For now, Ervin and his legal team are hopeful. But they know the road ahead isn’t easy. Whether he’s retried or released, Ervin’s case will be remembered as a turning point in the ongoing debate about fairness in our courts.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Darius Spearman is a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College, where he has been teaching since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.