Forging Family in the Furnace of the Auction Block

By Darius Spearman (africanelements)

Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.

The auction block buzzed, a grim marketplace where human beings became chattel. Imagine a carpenter, strong and stoic, standing beside his family—his wife, Mary, and their two small children, Ruth and Isaac. They were a unit, a family, until the booming voice of the auctioneer shattered it all. That voice was the official decree that a family was nothing more than an inventory list. Therefore, the system was not an accident; it was a ruthless, calculated business plan, designed to maximize profit by destroying connection. Upon arrival in the Americas, enslaved Africans faced a new set of tragedies: the systematic destruction of family bonds. Planters intentionally separated families to meet labor demands and weaken bonds within the enslaved community, making rebellion less likely by isolating individuals. The trauma was total; parents lived with the constant dread of loss, leaving individuals with lifelong grief after a sale. Despite these challenges, resilience emerged. Enslaved individuals forged extended kinship networks—unrelated individuals taking on familial roles, also called “fictive kin“—to fill the void left by fragmented nuclear families.

Order your copy of Legacy of Survival: The Dynamics of the Black Family. Available formats:

This video accompanies Chapter 3 of Legacy of Survival. Order your copy of Legacy of Survival: The Dynamics of the Black Family. Available formats:

• Paperback: $38
• Ebook: $12 — Instant Access

MEMBER DISCOUNTS ON ELECTRONIC VERSIONS:

• **Nation Builder Membership: Free Download (get your discount code here) .
• **Agent of Change Membership: $10 Discount (get your discount code here) .
• **Freedom Seeker Membership: $5 Discount (get your discount code here) .

The Iron Logic of the European Trade: African Response

The Transatlantic Slave Trade was a simple, brutal supply chain that lasted from 1444 to 1888. European demand for labor fueled this monstrous global industry, exploiting African political instability, including wars and judicial enslavements. African societies also integrated deeply into the trade, with coastal traders like the Ga becoming crucial intermediaries who supplied captives from the interior. Furthermore, the Portuguese established Luanda, Angola, in 1576, which became a central hub for shipping vast numbers of enslaved Africans. Enslaved individuals faced capture through warfare, raids, and the expansion of European-backed military forces. The Imbangala, a militarized group in Central Africa, were infamous for their brutal raiding practices, operating independently or as mercenaries for the Portuguese to supply the markets with captives. The journey itself, the “Middle Passage,” relied on systematic shipping networks where many perished during the voyage. Conversely, wealthier Africans, including Euro-African intermediaries, used their positions to safeguard their own families and profit from the trade, sometimes by marrying Europeans for protection and access to resources. This demonstrates the complex ways Africans navigated and leveraged the cruel system for survival and gain. The widespread raids and military campaigns depopulated vast areas of Central and West Africa, leaving communities barren.

Defying the Overseer: Agency in Survival Strategies

The separation of families was a deliberate act of dehumanization, yet enslaved people demonstrated resilience by creating surrogate families and preserving cultural practices. These acts of defiance laid the foundation for survival strategies. Despite physical separation, enslaved individuals risked severe punishment to maintain familial bonds. Men and women in “abroad marriages“—spouses living on different plantations—visited one another secretively through nighttime journeys and coordinated gatherings. These clandestine meetings were lifelines that nurtured emotional ties across forced divides. Naming practices also became a powerful tool of resistance, with children named after relatives to honor family connections and ensure their memory lived on. Enslaved families also engaged in small-scale economic ventures to supplement the meager provisions given by enslavers. Activities such as cultivating private garden plots and foraging became vital for survival, strengthening familial bonds and creating a semblance of economic autonomy. Additionally, these economic activities became acts of quiet resistance, asserting their humanity within an oppressive system.

The Unbroken Spirit: Cultural Resistance and the Fortress of Family

Storytelling and oral histories were central to maintaining a shared sense of identity among enslaved families. Through tales of ancestors and communal wisdom, they passed down values and memories that resisted the erasure imposed by slavery. Religious gatherings provided another crucial avenue for solidarity. Secret worship spaces, often called “praise houses,” became sanctuaries where enslaved individuals could express their spirituality and share in collective healing. These gatherings often doubled as covert meetings where families and communities discussed strategies for survival and resistance. Enslaved families used their collective strength to resist in subtle but powerful ways, such as feigning illness or working slowly, which gave enslaved individuals a sense of agency. Families also created “rival geographies,” secret spaces beyond the overseers’ watchful eyes where they could gather to plan resistance or find solace. The solidarity within enslaved families often served as the backbone for large-scale rebellions. Leaders such as Gabriel Prosser relied on kinship networks to recruit participants and coordinate uprisings with greater secrecy and efficiency. Women played a pivotal role in these rebellions by maintaining household stability and supporting the logistics of resistance, acting as messengers and preparing safehouses.

Asserting Humanity: Legal Defiance and the Rebuilding Imperative

For enslaved individuals, marriage was a fragile promise, legally unrecognized and easily revoked. Laws in slaveholding societies stripped enslaved people of their humanity by treating them as property, invalidating their most cherished relationships. Without legal protection, families were perpetually vulnerable to separation at the whims of enslavers. Therefore, enslaved individuals forged surrogate kinship networks to provide emotional and practical support. In addition to forging new networks, rituals such as “jumping the broom” symbolized the union of enslaved couples, defying the institution of slavery by creating meaningful bonds outside the confines of the law. After emancipation, the Freedmen’s Bureau played a vital role in aiding African Americans in reuniting with their families through advertisements and support networks. Freedmen and women demonstrated an extraordinary commitment to reuniting their families, with some traveling across multiple states on foot, armed with only a description of their loved ones. After emancipation, formalizing marriages became a vital step for African Americans in legitimizing their unions. Black churches emerged as critical spaces for supporting this effort, acting as repositories for records of births, marriages, and deaths, and providing spiritual and emotional guidance for familial reconnection. Marriage became a symbol of freedom and equality for freedpeople.

The Generational Echo: Resilience in Modern Black Families

The brutal institution of slavery not only fractured families but fundamentally reshaped the roles of men and women within them. Enslaved men faced emasculation through systemic separation from their families, undermining their roles as providers and protectors. Conversely, women often became the heads of households, a pattern that persisted in post-emancipation family dynamics. Economic disempowerment, stemming from systemic racism, led to higher rates of single-parent households. The intergenerational effects of slavery’s family fragmentation are still visible today, with patterns of single-parent households rooted in the economic and social inequities enforced during slavery. The extended family structures developed during slavery—multigenerational households providing emotional and practical support—have become a cornerstone of resilience for many Black families. Rather than adhering to a Eurocentric nuclear family model, Black households have historically relied on these communal living arrangements, which continue to serve as vital sources of emotional and financial support. Social institutions, such as churches and community organizations, remain central to supporting Black families, providing spiritual guidance and practical support in navigating the challenges that stem from historical traumas. The struggle to preserve familial bonds amidst enduring challenges continues, but the resilience demonstrated by generations of African Americans remains a powerful, unapologetic truth.

About the Author

Darius Spearman is a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College, where he has been teaching for over 20 years. He is the founder of African Elements, a media platform dedicated to providing educational resources on the history and culture of the African diaspora. Through his work, Spearman aims to empower and educate by bringing historical context to contemporary issues affecting the Black community.

Works Cited

Bardaglio, Peter W. “Rape and the Law in the Old South: ‘Calculated to Excite Indignation in Every Heart.” The Journal of Southern History, vol. 60, no. 4, 1994, pp. 749-772.

Berlin, Ira. “Time, Space, and the Evolution of Afro-American Society on British Mainland North America.” The American Historical Review, vol. 85, no. 1, 1980, pp. 44-78.

Bloome, Deirdre, and Christopher Muller. “Tenancy and African American Marriage in the Postbellum South.” Demography, vol. 52, no. 5, Oct. 2015, pp. 1409-1430.

Camp, Stephanie M. H. “The Pleasures of Resistance: Enslaved Women and Body Politics in the Plantation South, 1830-1861.” The Journal of Southern History, vol. 68, no. 3, Aug. 2002, pp. 533-572.

Egerton, Douglas R. “Slaves to the Marketplace: Economic Liberty and Black Rebelliousness in the Atlantic World.” Journal of the Early Republic, vol. 26, no. 4, 2006, pp. 617-639.

Foner, Eric. “Rights and the Constitution in Black Life during the Civil War and Reconstruction.” The Journal of American History, vol. 74, no. 3, Dec. 1987, pp. 863-883.

Frazier, E. Franklin. “The Negro Slave Family.” The Journal of Negro History, vol. 15, no. 2, Apr. 1930, pp. 198-259.

Gutman, Herbert G. “Persistent Myths about the Afro-American Family.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 6, no. 2, 1975, pp. 181-210.

Holt, Thomas C. “Marking: Race, Race-Making, and the Writing of History.” The American Historical Review, vol. 100, no. 1, Feb. 1995, pp. 1-20.

Ipsen, Pernille. “The Christened Mulatresses: Euro-African Families in a Slave-Trading Town.” The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 2, 2013, pp. 371-98.

Johnson, Walter. “On Agency.” Journal of Social History, vol. 37, no. 1, 2003, pp. 113-124.

Kolchin, Peter. “Reevaluating the Antebellum Slave Community: A Comparative Perspective.” The Journal of American History, vol. 70, no. 3, 1983, pp. 579-601.

Meacham, Mike. “The Myth of the Black Matriarchy under Slavery.” Mid-American Review of Sociology, vol. 8, no. 2, 1983, pp. 23-41.

Miller, Melinda C. “Destroyed by Slavery? Slavery and African American Family Formation Following Emancipation.” Demography, vol. 55, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1587-1609.

Moneyhon, Carl H. “The Slave Family in Arkansas.” The Arkansas Historical Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 1, Spring 1999, pp. 24-44.

Morgan, S. Philip, et al. “Racial Differences in Household and Family Structure at the Turn of the Century.” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 98, no. 4, 1993, pp. 799-828.

Ruggles, Steven. “The Origins of African-American Family Structure.” American Sociological Review, vol. 59, no. 1, Feb. 1994, pp. 136-151.

Schwartz, Marie Jenkins. “Family Life in the Slave Quarters: Survival Strategies.” OAH Magazine of History, vol. 15, no. 4, Summer 2001, pp. 36-41.

Thornton, John. “The African Experience of the ’20. and Odd Negroes’ Arriving in Virginia in 1619.” The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 55, no. 3, 1998, pp. 421-34.

White, John. “Whatever Happened to the Slave Family in the Old South?” Journal of American Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, 1974, pp. 383-390.

Wilkinson, Doris. “The Black Family: Past and Present: A Review Essay.” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 40, no. 4, 1978, pp. 829-835.