Sahel Region’s Counterterrorism Dilemma Unveiled Amid Western Interventions

By Darius Spearman (africanelements)

Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
Western military interventions in the Sahel are criticized for increasing instability.
Local populations often perceive these interventions as neocolonialism fueling resistance.
The withdrawal of Western forces has led to a vacuum exploited by non-state actors like the Wagner Group.
Regional cooperation through the Alliance of Sahel States aims to take control of counterterrorism efforts.
Human rights violations have escalated amid ongoing conflicts in the region.
Rethinking counterterrorism strategies to prioritize local needs is essential for stability.

Western Military Intervention in Africa: Counterterrorism or Neocolonialism?

In Africa, the Sahel region has become a major focus for Western efforts in the war on terror. France leads operations like Operation Barkhane to fight terrorist groups, but success is doubtful. These actions have raised debates about their effect on local people and the risk of causing more unrest.

Western forces have faced accusations of harming civilians and worsening humanitarian problems. Many locals see these military activities as new forms of colonialism pretending to be counterterrorism. This view has led to widespread mistrust and pushback among Sahel communities.

The president of the West Africa Peoples Organization (WAPO) clearly said: “There is no terrorism, there is France.” This statement captures the belief that countries like France are the real source of problems in the area. (Brasil de Fato).

The Vacuum Left by Western Withdrawal

As Western forces start leaving countries like Mali, they create serious power gaps. These gaps are quickly taken advantage of by non-state groups, including Russian mercenaries like the Wagner Group. As a result, instability and human rights abuses have increased.

The early months of 2022 saw a rise in violence, especially in the Liptako-Gourma area. Over 2,000 civilians died, showing how fragile the region’s security is. (Global Conflict Tracker).

If left unchecked, the strength of violent extremist groups could make the humanitarian crisis worse. There are big fears about instability spreading further across Africa.

Sahel States Seek Regional Solutions

Faced with these rising problems, countries in the region are boosting cooperation through efforts like the Alliance of Sahel States (ASS). This group aims to combine military and financial resources to fight terrorism and lessen reliance on Western support.

The founding of ASS responds directly to what is seen as Western neo-colonialism. It shows a united plan to manage regional security matters and seek an independent path. (Brasil de Fato).

While the success of this regional strategy is uncertain, it marks a big move away from relying on outside help. The ASS hopes to tackle the main causes of unrest and terrorism with local solutions.

The Global War on Terror: Context and Consequences

Western actions in the Sahel are part of a bigger world campaign that has changed since the 9/11 attacks. Their strategies include military actions, diplomacy, and financial tactics to fight terrorism. However, these plans often face criticism for harming human rights and international law.

The war on terror has blurred the roles of fighters and civilians. This has caused unlawful killings, endless detentions, and the weakening of civil freedoms in various places. The Sahel region has not escaped these harmful trends.

Wagner Group in Mali: A New Threat Emerges

The Wagner Group’s actions in Mali have drawn global criticism for grave human rights violations. Their presence highlights the complicated network of groups competing for regional power.

The Wagner Group’s future in West Africa became uncertain after a failed Russian rebellion in 2023. Yet, their involvement has already left a permanent mark on the area’s security picture. (Global Conflict Tracker).

Defining Counterterrorism and Neocolonialism in the Sahel

To understand the challenges in the Sahel, it’s essential to define key terms like counterterrorism and neocolonialism. Counterterrorism involves strategies and actions aimed at preventing and responding to terrorist activities. Governments and organizations use various methods, including military operations and intelligence gathering, to combat terrorism (Counterterrorism – Wikipedia). In contrast, neocolonialism refers to indirect control or influence exerted by powerful countries over less developed regions. Without formal colonial rule, this can happen through economic, political, or cultural pressures.

In the Sahel, many locals perceive Western military actions as a form of neocolonialism. They believe that these interventions serve the interests of foreign powers rather than addressing the needs of the local population. Consequently, this perception fuels mistrust and resistance against external forces.

Operation Barkhane and Regional Responses

France launched Operation Barkhane in 2014 to support Sahel countries in fighting terrorist groups. The operation provided military assistance to nations like Mali, Niger, and Chad (Terrorism: France’s International Action). However, as time passed, questions arose about its effectiveness and impact on local communities.

In response, regional nations formed the Alliance of Sahel States to address security issues collectively. This alliance aims to pool resources and develop local solutions to counter-terrorism, reducing reliance on external forces. By working together, Sahel countries hope to strengthen their ability to maintain regional stability and security.

The Human Impact: Civilian Casualties and Humanitarian Crisis

Western military interventions have sometimes led to unintended harm to civilians. Civilian casualties not only cause immediate suffering but also contribute to long-term resentment toward foreign forces (Counterterrorism – Wikipedia). The ongoing conflict has also worsened a severe humanitarian crisis in the Sahel. Many people face displacement, food shortages, and lack of access to basic services.

Humanitarian organizations work tirelessly to provide aid, but the instability makes these efforts challenging. It’s important to address these humanitarian needs to prevent further deterioration of the situation. Moreover, minimizing civilian harm is essential to gaining the trust of local communities.

The Security Vacuum and Local Views

When Western forces withdrew from countries like Mali, they left a security vacuum. This absence of effective governance allowed extremist groups and other non-state actors to gain influence. Local authorities often struggle to fill this gap, which leads to increased instability (Counterterrorism – Wikipedia).

Local communities hold diverse views on external interventions. Many express frustration that foreign military presence does not address their underlying issues. They emphasize the need for solutions that consider their experiences and involve them directly in the process. Policymakers can develop more effective strategies to achieve lasting peace by understanding local concerns.

Groups like the Wagner Group add another layer of complexity to the Sahel conflict. Their actions can undermine efforts toward stability and may worsen the humanitarian situation. Therefore, regional and international actors need to monitor and address the impact of such groups.

Rethinking Counterterrorism in the Sahel

In Africa, particularly in the Sahel, the war on terror has sparked much debate. Western interventions, though well-intentioned, have often worsened instability and fueled discontent among locals.

As regional countries work to find their way with initiatives like the Alliance of Sahel States, a major change in counterterrorism strategies is necessary. Effective solutions must focus on local communities, address the root causes of instability, and respect human rights.

The Sahel’s situation highlights the complex and unplanned outcomes of the global war on terror. It points to the urgent need for a more detailed approach that goes beyond military actions to tackle social, economic, and political factors driving extremism.

FAQ

Q: What has been the impact of Western military interventions in the Sahel region?
A: Western military interventions, such as Operation Barkhane, have faced criticism for causing civilian casualties and exacerbating humanitarian crises, leading many locals to view these efforts as a form of neocolonialism.

Q: How do local populations perceive these Western interventions?
A: Many local communities express distrust towards Western forces, seeing them as contributors to regional instability, with sentiments like “There is no terrorism, there is France” highlighting their perspective.

Q: What has happened following the withdrawal of Western forces from the Sahel?
A: The withdrawal has created a power vacuum that has been filled by non-state actors, including the Wagner Group, which has resulted in increased violence and human rights abuses.

Q: What efforts are being made by Sahel states to combat terrorism?
A: Regional countries have formed the Alliance of Sahel States (ASS) to pool military and economic resources, aiming to take control of regional security and reduce dependence on Western interventions.

Q: What is the future of counterterrorism strategies in the Sahel?
A: There’s a growing recognition that effective counterterrorism requires addressing local needs, root causes of instability, and upholding human rights, reflecting a shift towards more nuanced approaches beyond military intervention.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Darius Spearman is a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College, where he has been teaching since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.