Listen to this article
Download AudioDow Chemical Lawsuits Reveal Disturbing Workplace Discrimination
By Darius Spearman (africanelements)
Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.
KEY TAKEAWAYS |
---|
A dozen Black employees have sued Dow Chemical for racial discrimination. |
Allegations include harassment, racial slurs, and retaliation. |
Dow Chemical denies all claims following internal reviews. |
Evidence suggests a persistent hostile work environment in Midland, Michigan. |
Gender discrimination was also reported, impacting Black women disproportionately. |
The lawsuits highlight a broader issue of systemic racism in corporate America. |
Systemic Racism Exposed: Black Employees Sue Dow Chemical
In a major development exposing widespread workplace discrimination, a dozen Black employees sued Dow Chemical. Their claims reveal appalling racial bias, retaliation, and an unfriendly work setting, mainly at the Midland, Michigan plant.
Dow’s Workforce Diversity Progress
Filed over several months, the lawsuits demand compensation, lost wages, and legal costs. They uncover a troubling pattern of unfair treatment that questions corporate America’s real interest in diversity and inclusion.
Specific Incidents of Racial Discrimination
The employees shared many racist incidents that shock the conscience. Sushma Jones, a logistics technician since January 2022, faced immediate harassment from white male coworkers. In March 2022, a false damage accusation was thrown at her by a white supervisor, resulting in further mistreatment and no help with her duties. (Atlanta Black Star)
Racial Discrimination Complaints at Dow Chemical
12 Lawsuits
Filed by current and former Black employees.
Midland, MI
Most incidents occurred at this plant.
Allegations
Racial discrimination and retaliation.
Source: Atlanta Black Star
Racial slurs, reflecting a racist mindset, were common at Dow Chemical. Kelvin Walker was called “the N-word” by a coworker who was not disciplined. Walker tried to address this mistreatment but was fired as a result, illustrating clear retaliation. (Atlanta Black Star)
Hostile Work Environment: Beyond Words
The harsh environment at Dow Chemical included more than language. Roger Ivey found pictures of monkeys on lockers, a blatant act of racism. Although he requested training, he lacked the necessary preparation for his job, underlining ongoing discrimination. (Atlanta Black Star)
Race and gender bias both affected Rosetta Biggins. Less experienced white men received training and promotion opportunities ahead of her, while she handled menial tasks because of her race and gender. This shows that Black women often deal with multiple layers of discrimination at work. (Atlanta Black Star)
Dow Chemical’s Denial: A Familiar Corporate Response
In a predictable corporate move, Dow Chemical denies all allegations of racial and gender discrimination. The company claims their reviews found no support for these claims. (Atlanta Black Star)
Such responses often show how companies prioritize their reputation over addressing real issues. Firms like Dow ignore the systemic inequities they insist they battle by using internal reviews to find no wrongdoing.
Timeline of Injustice
This timeline shows that issues at Dow Chemical are not single events but reflect an ongoing culture of unfairness.
Sources: FAO, World Vision
Historical Context of Racial Studies at BLS
9 Studies
Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
1884-1906
Period during which the studies were conducted.
Commissioner Carroll D. Wright
Led the Bureau of Labor Statistics during the studies.
W.E.B. Du Bois
Assisted in conducting the studies on African American work and life.
These studies provide critical insights into the socio-economic conditions of African Americans during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Source: Rediscovering Black History
The Broader Implications: Corporate America’s Problem with Racism
The Dow Chemical lawsuits signal deeper issues in corporate America, not isolated cases. Even with years of diversity programs, many companies remain unfriendly to Black employees.
These lawsuits show that workplace racism is still real today. They reveal the gap between corporate pledges and practiced reality, showing how systemic racism persists in many so-called progressive companies.
The Need for Systemic Change
The lawsuits against Dow Chemical reveal an urgent call for real change in corporate settings. Training programs and policies aren’t enough alone. Companies must truly shift power balances within their structures.
Businesses need to go further than symbolic support and take strong steps to break down systems that allow racial bias to remain. This means fixing pay gaps, promoting Black leaders, and creating genuinely inclusive environments.
Understanding Systemic Racism in the Workplace
Systemic racism refers to the complex ways racial bias is embedded within societal institutions. It affects hiring practices, pay scales, and opportunities for advancement for people of color, especially Black Americans. (Systemic Racism in Corporate America – Sustainability Update)
At Dow Chemical, the allegations reveal how systemic racism can create barriers even without overt individual prejudice. This form of racism persists through policies and practices that disadvantage marginalized groups. (Systemic Racism in Corporate America – Sustainability Update)
To grasp the depth of these issues, it’s important to understand the concept of systemic racism.
Defining Systemic Racism

Systemic Racism: Policies and practices within institutions that disadvantage certain groups. Unlike personal prejudice, it exists within social, economic, and political systems. Recognizing this form of racism is essential to address the root causes of inequalities in the workplace.
The Legal Battle Ahead: Potential Consequences for Dow Chemical
As these lawsuits proceed, Dow Chemical could face significant legal and financial repercussions. If the plaintiffs prove their claims, the company might have to pay substantial compensatory and exemplary damages. (What are Exemplary Damages? Exemplary Damages Defined)
Compensatory damages aim to reimburse victims for their losses, while exemplary damages punish the defendant for willful misconduct. The jury decides on these awards based on the evidence presented. (What are Exemplary Damages? Exemplary Damages Defined)
Moreover, the company’s reputation could suffer, affecting its operations and investor trust. This situation emphasizes the importance of addressing systemic issues proactively.
The Role of Whistleblower Protections
Employees who report discrimination rely on whistleblower protections to shield them from retaliation. These legal safeguards encourage individuals to come forward without fear of losing their jobs or facing other reprisals. (Hostile Work Environment: Definition & Signs | HR Acuity)
In the cases against Dow Chemical, plaintiffs allege retaliatory actions after reporting discrimination. Whistleblower laws exist to prevent such retaliation and to promote accountability within organizations. (Systemic Racism in Corporate America – Sustainability Update)
However, these protections vary by jurisdiction, and their effectiveness depends on enforcement. Strengthening whistleblower protections can play a key role in combating workplace discrimination.
Challenges Within Internal Review Processes
Dow Chemical’s denial of the allegations following internal reviews raises concerns about the effectiveness of such processes. Internal reviews may lack objectivity, especially if conducted by parties within the organization who have a stake in the outcome. (Systemic Racism in Corporate America – Sustainability Update)
When companies repeatedly find no wrongdoing despite serious allegations, it suggests a potential failure to address systemic problems. Independent investigations can provide a more unbiased assessment of the issues. (Interrogating Race and Racism)
Therefore, relying solely on internal reviews might perpetuate discrimination instead of resolving it. Transparency and accountability are crucial for meaningful change.
The Fight for Workplace Equality Continues
The Dow Chemical lawsuits indicate that the struggle for racial equality at work persists. They showcase the bravery of Black employees speaking against unfair practices and challenging usual methods.
- The fight for workplace equality involves more than legal action or company policies
- It involves dismantling structures that uphold social inequality
As these cases proceed, they will further spotlight workplace discrimination. But real change will ensure when companies like Dow face the need to take responsibility and fix their systemic racism.
FAQ
Q: What are the main allegations against Dow Chemical?
A: A dozen current and former Black employees have filed lawsuits against Dow Chemical, alleging racial discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment, particularly at the Midland, Michigan plant.
Q: What specific incidents of discrimination have been reported?
A: Plaintiffs have recounted incidents, including harassment, false accusations of misconduct, the use of racial slurs, and visible racial harassment such as derogatory imagery in the workplace.
Q: How has Dow Chemical responded to these allegations?
A: Dow Chemical has denied all claims of racial and gender discrimination, stating that internal reviews found no substantiation for the allegations.
Q: What impact do these lawsuits have on corporate America?
A: These lawsuits reveal systemic racism in the workplace and challenge the narrative that progress has been made in corporate diversity and inclusion initiatives.
Q: What changes are being called for in response to these allegations?
A: There is a call for systemic changes in corporate structures, including addressing power dynamics, pay disparities, and fostering inclusive environments for all employees.
Q: What does this mean for the future of workplace equality?
A: The ongoing lawsuits highlight the enduring struggle for racial equality in the workplace, stressing the need for accountability and systemic change to dismantle structures of inequality.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Darius Spearman is a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College, where he has been teaching since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.