Hands Off Protests: Trump Policies & Musk Cuts 2025

By Darius Spearman (africanelements)

Support African Elements at patreon.com/africanelements and hear recent news in a single playlist. Additionally, you can gain early access to ad-free video content.

On April 5, a massive wave of protests has swept across the United States and even internationally. Over 1.4 million people took to the streets in a coordinated effort against the Trump administration’s policies (Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship). This marks one of the largest demonstrations seen in years, showing deep public concern.

Nationwide Uprising: Trump Protest Statistics

The scale of these demonstrations was truly nationwide. Protesters gathered in all 50 states, holding events at more than 1,200 different locations (Protests against Trump policies draw millions nationwide, including Bay Area; Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship). Major cities like New York, Los Angeles, and Washington D.C. saw huge crowds, with up to 100,000 people assembling in the nation’s capital (Protests against Trump policies draw millions nationwide, including Bay Area). Notably, the discontent wasn’t limited to large urban centers.

Smaller cities also experienced significant turnout. For instance, Davenport, Iowa, witnessed its largest protests since 2020 (Protests against Trump policies draw millions nationwide, including Bay Area). Solidarity wasn’t confined by borders, either. International protests popped up in the UK, Germany, France, and Portugal, condemning the actions of the Trump administration and figures like Elon Musk (Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship). This global response underscores the widespread impact of these policies.

Why We March: Social Security & Rights Targeted

A major focus of the protests involved deep budget cuts proposed under Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Demonstrators voiced strong opposition to federal employee layoffs and the closure of Social Security offices (Protests against Trump policies draw millions nationwide, including Bay Area). For many communities, especially Black families who often rely more heavily on these federal programs and employment opportunities, such cuts represent a direct threat to economic stability.

Furthermore, cuts to health program funding sparked significant concern. Reductions in protections for transgender individuals also fueled the demonstrations (Protests against Trump policies draw millions nationwide, including Bay Area). Protesters also challenged harsh immigration crackdowns, including mass deportations and denying benefits to immigrants. The administration claimed these measures were about “protecting seniors,” a justification demonstrators rejected (Protests against Trump policies draw millions nationwide, including Bay Area). These policies collectively paint a picture of an administration targeting vulnerable populations.

Voices from the Streets: Diverse Groups Mobilize

The protests drew a diverse coalition of participants. In Detroit, for example, autoworkers, educators, and healthcare workers marched together, with over 10,000 people taking part (Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship). This strong showing from the labor sectors highlights the economic anxieties fueling the discontent. Working families, many within the Black community, feel the direct impact of policies affecting jobs and public services.

Additionally, students and young people were a visible force. They emphasized threats to academic freedom and free speech, pointing to concerns over AI surveillance programs like the alleged “Catch and Revoke” initiative (Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship). Protesters also explicitly condemned U.S. support for the ongoing war in Gaza (Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship). International demonstrators in cities like Berlin and Paris framed their participation within broader anti-fascist struggles, connecting U.S. domestic policies to global concerns (Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship).

Echoes of Fascism? Trump’s Rhetoric Under Scrutiny

Some critics, including sources covering the protests, labeled the administration’s direction as moving towards a “fascist dictatorship” (Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship). This strong language stems from specific actions and rhetoric. For instance, Trump’s comparison of undocumented immigrants to “poison” that is “polluting the blood” of the U.S. directly echoes historical Nazi racial purity propaganda (Donald Trump and fascism). His rally rhetoric often dehumanizes migrants, calling them “predators” and “vile animals,” which critics argue justifies violence against them (Donald Trump and fascism). This kind of language carries heavy historical weight, particularly for Black communities familiar with dehumanization tactics used to justify oppression.

Moreover, scholars point to other warning signs. Academics like Benedetta Carnaghi and Robert Paxton argue Trump exhibits elements of fascist ideology, such as manufacturing crises without factual basis and glorifying political violence, like praising January 6th rioters (Is Trump a Fascist?; Is Trump a Fascist? Peter Bergen). The administration’s past family separation policy led to conditions historian Andrea Pitzer compared to concentration camps (Donald Trump and fascism). Concerns persist about plans for expanded mass detentions should Trump gain a second term (Trump Is Clearly Moving in an Authoritarian and Potentially Fascist …). These authoritarian tendencies raise alarms about democratic norms and fundamental human rights.

Official Responses & Political Framing

In response to the widespread protests, the White House issued a statement. It claimed the administration was actually working to “protect” Social Security and Medicaid. Curiously, it simultaneously accused Democrats of threatening these very programs by supporting immigrants (Protests against Trump policies draw millions nationwide, including Bay Area). This framing attempts to deflect criticism and shift blame, directly contradicting the protesters’ stated reasons for mobilizing – namely, the administration’s own proposed cuts and policies.

Meanwhile, other political groups offered their analysis. The Socialist Equality Party (SEP), for example, interpreted the situation as evidence of systemic failures under capitalism. They argued that Trump’s policies create the conditions for a working-class movement pushing for socialism (Millions protest across the US against Trump’s efforts to establish a fascist dictatorship). This highlights the differing ideological lenses through which the political moment is viewed and contested.

The massive demonstrations across the country and globally send a clear message of opposition. Millions are concerned about budget cuts impacting essential services like Social Security, rollbacks of rights, harsh immigration policies, U.S. foreign policy, and attacks on free speech. The sheer scale and diversity of these protests signal deep unease with the current administration’s direction, fueled by both specific policies and alarming rhetoric echoing dark historical precedents.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Darius Spearman is a professor of Black Studies at San Diego City College, where he has been teaching since 2007. He is the author of several books, including Between The Color Lines: A History of African Americans on the California Frontier Through 1890. You can visit Darius online at africanelements.org.